Skip to content
Range Compare

Side by side · Facts only

Conducttr beside SimSpace: training types and facts side by side

Short answer

Conducttr sells tabletop and crisis simulation; SimSpace sells cyber range. They differ on 2 of 4 training types and 5 of 8 checks on the pages we read. This page sets their published facts side by side; it does not pick one.

By The Range Desk · Cyber Range Compare · Published 2026-10-11 · Updated 2026-10-13

Desk research from public vendor, standards and regulator pages read on 27 September, 11 October and 13 October 2026. Profiles follow our published method; we did not run the products.

Which training types does each sell?

Conducttr lanes: sells 1 of 4 training types; not in our sources for 3. Compared with SimSpace lanes: sells 1 of 4 training types; not in our sources for 3.Not foundRANGELive fireNot foundLABSSolo skillsSoldCRISISDecisionsNot foundAWAREEvery employee
  • Targets: Conducttr
  • Diamonds: SimSpace
  • RANGE · Cyber range: Not in our sources; SimSpace: Sold
  • LABS · Hands-on lab libraries: Not in our sources; SimSpace: Not in our sources
  • CRISIS · Tabletop and crisis simulation: Sold; SimSpace: Not in our sources
  • AWARE · Awareness training: Not in our sources; SimSpace: Not in our sources
The lanes show what each platform's own pages describe, or how your answers weigh the four training types. They do not measure how well a product works.
  • Filled target: the platform sells this training type on the pages we read
  • Hatched target: sold with a condition (an add-on, an adjacent product, or part of the type)
  • Dashed target: not in our sources (it may exist; we did not find it)
From each platform's own pages, read 27 September or 11 October 2026.
TypeConducttrSimSpace
Cyber rangeNot in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

Sold

"Bring your team, your tools, or your AI agents. We'll build the environment, run the attack, and show you the results."

Source: SimSpace homepage · Read 11 Oct 2026

Hands-on lab librariesNot in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

Not in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

Tabletop and crisis simulationSold

Virtual Desktop, Scenario Editor and Conducttr Worlds; exercises run virtual, in person or hybrid, from one team to 1,000+ simultaneous teams.

Source: Conducttr homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Not in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

Awareness trainingNot in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

Not in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

Where do their published facts differ?

  • Cyber range: Conducttr Not in our sources, SimSpace Sold

    Conducttr: Not described on the pages we read.

    SimSpace: "Bring your team, your tools, or your AI agents. We'll build the environment, run the attack, and show you the results."

  • Tabletop and crisis simulation: Conducttr Sold, SimSpace Not in our sources

    Conducttr: Virtual Desktop, Scenario Editor and Conducttr Worlds; exercises run virtual, in person or hybrid, from one team to 1,000+ simultaneous teams.

    SimSpace: Not described on the pages we read.

  • Hands-on keyboard work: Conducttr Not in our sources, SimSpace Partly

    Conducttr: Not in our sources.

    SimSpace: Teams work in an environment SimSpace builds and attacks; lab content is not described on the homepage.

  • Executives and non-technical roles take part: Conducttr Matches, SimSpace Not in our sources

    Conducttr: Built for crisis teams, with role-specific content for the players and exercises in person, online or hybrid.

    SimSpace: Not in our sources.

  • Built around your own environment or tools: Conducttr Not in our sources, SimSpace Matches

    Conducttr: Not in our sources.

    SimSpace: Teams can bring their own tools into the environment SimSpace builds.

  • Reports or evidence for auditors, boards or regulators: Conducttr Partly, SimSpace Not in our sources

    Conducttr: Real-time analytics and central reporting; the Assessment Toolkit is priced separately, from £4,536 a year.

    SimSpace: Not in our sources.

  • Price published: Conducttr Matches, SimSpace Not in our sources

    Conducttr: Four licences published: Raven £11,950, Hawk £16,465, Osprey £21,000 and Eagle £25,725 a year, each for up to 40 participants per session, in GBP excluding tax.

    SimSpace: Not in our sources.

Where do they match?

They match on no lane or check that either platform's pages describe.

Neither platform's pages describe: Hands-on lab libraries, Awareness training, Free start (free tier, trial or free material), Sessions of an hour or less, Reaches the whole workforce.

What do they cost?

Conducttr

Raven £11,950, Hawk £16,465, Osprey £21,000 and Eagle £25,725 a year, each for up to 40 participants per session, GBP excluding tax. Assessment Toolkit from £4,536 a year. Larger exercises and Conducttr Local are priced on request.

Source: Conducttr pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026

SimSpace

Not published; the route in is a discovery call.

Source: SimSpace homepage · Read 11 Oct 2026

How do their strengths and limits compare?

Conducttr

Strengths

  • The only full public price list in this set: four licences from £11,950 to £25,725 a year.
  • Simulates the information environment around the players: news, social media and messaging.
  • Scales from one team to 1,000+ simultaneous teams, in person, online or hybrid.

Limits

  • You design and run the exercise yourself in the Scenario Editor, which is closer to exercise design than to a ready-made scenario.
  • No technical hands-on training, and the template library is general crisis content rather than cyber-specific.

SimSpace

Strengths

  • Builds the environment and runs the attack, with your own team and tools.
  • Tests AI agents as well as people, for organisations validating agentic security tools.
  • Frames exercises as proof of readiness rather than course completion.

Limits

  • No labs, crisis simulation or awareness training described on the pages we read.
  • No published price, and the homepage centres on validating AI agents more than on training people.

Which one fits which team?

Look at Conducttr if you want to design your own crisis exercises and see the price before a call, or if your exercise needs simulated press and social media pressure. Look at SimSpace if you want an attack run against your own team and tools in an environment built for you, or if you are testing AI agents alongside your human analysts.

Not sure which training type you need first? The training type finder weighs your answers before it lists platforms.

Questions people ask

Is Conducttr or SimSpace cheaper?

Conducttr publishes a price: Raven £11,950, Hawk £16,465, Osprey £21,000 and Eagle £25,725 a year, each for up to 40 participants per session, GBP excluding tax. Assessment Toolkit from £4,536 a year. Larger exercises and Conducttr Local are priced on request. SimSpace does not publish a price on the pages we read.

Do Conducttr and SimSpace sell the same kind of training?

They do not overlap on the pages we read. Conducttr also sells tabletop and crisis simulation; SimSpace also sells cyber range.

Can I compare several platforms at once?

Yes. The platform fact grid puts up to twelve side by side, and you can pick which ones.

  • Conducttr profile

    A crisis exercise platform for building and running your own exercises, which simulates news, social media and messaging around the players.

  • SimSpace profile

    A range vendor that now presents itself as AI Proving Grounds: it builds an environment, runs an attack against your team, your tools or your AI agents, and shows the results.

  • Tabletop and crisis simulation

    The people who own decisions in an incident work through a scenario and decide what to do, from a scripted discussion to an adaptive simulation.

  • Cyber range

    A team detects and responds to a live simulated attack in a realistic environment, using real security tools.

  • Platform fact grid

    Every platform's facts in one table.